Logo Speekur NB.png
Around the View is the place to find the most important news and opinions from around the internet. Our primary focus is on non-mainstream and independent outlets. Instead of browsing through numerous sites, subscribe to receive, videos, podcasts news, and opinion from around the internet in one place.

Thanks for subscribing!

Take The Vaccines But Don't Mandate It

By Petter Attia (MD)


In this article, Peter Attia explains why he believes Covid vaccines save lives but shouldn't be mandated.


His opposition to mandates does not in any way diminish his belief in the data that supports the efficacy of the vaccines in preventing serious illness and death. He states,


Let’s say we faced a virus that killed 100% of those who contracted it. A vaccine with a 50% RRR (i.e., only “50% effective”), meaning it reduced deaths by half, would save over 150 million lives in the U.S. But if we faced another virus that killed 0.1% of those who caught it, even a vaccine with 99% RRR (i.e., “99% effective”) would “only” save about 300,000 lives (by lowering the death rate from 0.1% to 0.001%). In other words, in this scenario the vaccine that is 50% is far more valuable—and saves orders of magnitude more lives—than the one that is 99% effective that reduces deaths from 0.1% to 0.001%. How is it possible that a vaccine that is only 50% effective could save more than 150 million lives, while one that is 99% effective can only save 300,000 lives? Because of absolute risk reduction. The 50% effective vaccine is up against a virus that infects and kills every single person in a given population, so in absolute terms it is wildly effective, literally saving one out of every two lives of the people who take it. Conversely, the vaccine that is 99% effective is up against a virus that only kills 1 out 1,000 people who encounter it.

Despite his belief in the vaccine efficacy, he doesn't think they should be mandated.


Read the full article on Peter Attia website